Nevada Rancher Drawing Criticism For Suggesting Blacks Better Off During Slavery

ClivenBundyAfter drawing the admiration of conservatives across the nation for his stand against the federal government over grazing fees, Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy made it a bit dicier for some folks to continue their support when he pondered during an interview whether “the Negro” was better off during slavery.

Bundy told reporters over the weekend that when he drove by a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, he saw “at least a half-dozen (Black) people sitting on the porch, they didn’t have nothing to do.”

“Because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?” he added in comments first reported by the New York Times and later seen on video. “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton.

“I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”

The statements caused some politicians to back off from their support of Bundy — Nevada’s Republican Sen. Dean Heller, who previously called Bundy and the militiamen protecting him “patriots,” said the statements were “racist.” Fox News television host Sean Hannity, previously a vociferous Bundy supporter, said they were “ignorant, racist, repugnant, despicable comments.”

But Bundy gave another interview with CNN during which he didn’t back down.

“I don’t think I’m wrong,” Bundy told CNN’s Bill Weir on Thursday night. “I think I’m right.”

Bundy said he’d been simply “wondering whether (Blacks) are that much better off in the situation we’re in now.”

He said he “didn’t really mean it to compare (African-Americans’ current plight) with slavery. I meant to compare it with maybe life on the farm or life in the South, where they had some chickens and the gardens, and they had something to do.”

But Bundy stood by his general premise that Blacks once had better lives, saying right now: “They don’t have nothing to do with their children, their family unit is ruined … That’s what I was referring to, I don’t think they have the life that they should have” because of the government.

He was asked by Weir how he arrived at these generalizations.

“I feel that, because I see that,” Bundy explained.

For two decades, Bundy’s cattle have fed off of government-owned land without paying grazing fees like thousands of other ranchers. The government says he owes $1 million to the feds and armed federal agents moved to oversee the roundup of hundreds of Bundy’s cattle across half-a-million acres managed by the Bureau of Land Management. But a ragtag group of armed men flocked to his ranch from around the country, drawn by his stand against the federal government. The federal government released his cattle back onto public land and the militia are still protecting him.

Bundy’s wife, Carol, on Thursday tried to defend her husband, telling the Los Angeles Times, “What he was saying is that there are lots of different forms of slavery. Welfare is one kind. It’s just another way to suppress people.”

“His statements were not a criticism of Blacks. They criticized the federal government,” Brandon Rapolla, a concrete mixer from Oregon who spent eight days at the ranch, told the Times. “I’ve met the Bundys, and that’s not who they are.”

Meanwhile, television host Stephen Colbert delivered a stinging comic diatribe against Bundy and Hannity on Comedy Central, saying the two men “go together like Ku and Klux.”

When CNN’s Weir challenged the Nevada rancher about whether he was any more or less a “welfare queen” as those who get entitlement checks—since his cattle have been feeding off the government, literally, by eating grass on public land—Bundy said, “I might be a welfare queen. But I’ll tell you I’m producing something for America and using a resource that nobody else would use or could use. I’m putting red meat on the table.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top