Leader Bemoans St. Lucia’s Abstention From UN Vote on Russia-Crimea Conflict

prudent st. luciaCASTRIES, St. Lucia — The leader of the Lucian People’s Movement (LPM), Therold Prudent, has described as “irresponsible and cowardly” Saint Lucia’s decision to abstain from voting on a U.N. General Assembly resolution denouncing the recent annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation.

The LPM’s reaction comes in the wake of last Thursday’s General Assembly vote, which saw a total of 100 nations, including The Bahamas, Barbados, Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago and Haiti, voting a resounding yes, sending a clear message to Russia that its infringement of Ukraine’s territorial integrity and its violation of international law were unacceptable.

Prudent noted that, while he is fully aware that there was immense pressure from Russia on many foreign governments to either vote no, abstain or boycott the voting altogether, “our nation’s decision to allow itself to fall into one of the three categories which Russia favored speaks volumes about how desperate we have become for foreign aid even if the financial support we seek is tainted by the suffering of people in foreign lands.”

The LPM leader also stated that while there’s been a renewal of Russian diplomatic interest in St. Lucia, and he understands that great care must therefore be exercised in the further development of this relationship, “we cannot turn a blind eye to the resurgence of Russia’s need for territorial expansion in Eastern Europe and its ongoing desire to eventually set up a permanent military base in Nicaragua and other Latin American nations.”

Prudent believes that the current territorial dispute between Nicaragua and Costa Rica presents fertile ground for regional instability should Russia ever succeed in its long-term goal of setting up military bases in Nicaragua and elsewhere.

“Such a situation would only exacerbate the growing tensions between the United States and Russia and help fuel a return to the anti-American sentiments which were so prevalent in the region during the 1970s and ’80s,” he added.

In this regard, Prudent called on the government of St. Lucia to refrain from giving the international community the impression that the nation is devoid of any meaningful conviction on issues that are so critical to achieving global peace and stability, or any reason to misinterpret silence as a tacit endorsement of Russia’s blatant disregard for the rule of international law.

Russia received the unequivocal support of only ten nations, among them Venezuela, Nicaragua, North Korea, Syria and Zimbabwe.

Source: caribbeannewsnow.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top