Has The Face Behind Bitcoin Been Uncovered?

bitcoin-founder

An article in Newsweek that says it has found the real Satoshi Nakamoto, the alias used by the creator of the virtual currency Bitcoin, has prompted many enthusiasts to question whether the right person had been identified.

According to the Newsweek article published online on Thursday, the real Satoshi Nakamoto is a 64-year-old model train buff living in Southern California with his mom. His birth name was, in fact, Satoshi Nakamoto, which had previously been thought to be a pseudonym for the creator, or group of creators, behind Bitcoin.

When approached by a reporter, Nakamoto said that he was “no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it.”

“It’s been turned over to other people. They are in charge of it now. I no longer have any connection,” he is quoted as saying.

The origins of Bitcoin, a computer-driven form of money that only exists online, have been a mystery since it appeared in 2009. Other publications have tried, and failed, to identify the real Satoshi Nakamoto. Newsweek says it found Nakamoto by going through a database of naturalized American citizens.

According to the article, Nakamoto was born in Japan, the spiritual birthplace of Bitcoin, and now goes by “Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto.”

Nakamoto appeared to have called the police when a Newsweek reporter came to his home, so great was his desire to not speak about the virtual currency. Various relatives quoted in the story also did not know, or did not say, whether he created Bitcoin.

People have generally thought that Bitcoin was created by a group of programmers rather than an individual because of its complex mathematics and structure. The Newsweek article links Nakamoto to Bitcoin through various work experiences, but offers no hard evidence.

Read the full story at nytimes.com

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top