Private Matters: Snapchat Tries to Downplay Hack

snapchat-rejects-facebook1

Following security researchers announcing a way to match Snapchat usernames to telephone numbers, Snapchat has published a skimpy statement making the hack sound impractical and noting, “We recently added additional counter-measures and continue to make improvements to combat spam and abuse.”

Earlier this week ZDNet published an in-depth report on how white-hat Gibson Security researchers had tried to notify Snapchat of a way hackers could connect usernames to phone numbers for use in stalking, but were ignored. The GibSec team then published the exploitpublicly on Christmas Eve. Read ZDNet’s post for full details on how the hack works.

Snapchat hadn’t provided a public statement until now, and what it’s offered isn’t very satisfying. “Theoretically, if someone were able to upload a huge set of phone numbers, like every number in an area code, or every possible number in the U.S., they could create a database of the results and match usernames to phone numbers that way. Over the past year, we’ve implemented various safeguards to make it more difficult to do.”

It goes on to note it’s added more barriers to the use of this hack.

There are no details on how these countermeasures work, such as rate limiting, bad IP blocking, or automated systems that scan suspicious activity when someone is trying to match names and numbers. The vagueness could keep the new barriers from being evaded, but doesn’t offer much comfort to users.

Snapchat correctly stresses there’s no easy way to discover someone’s phone number based on their username or vice-versa. And it explains that the ability to match names and phone numbers on a limited basis is very helpful for users trying to find their friends on the service through their phone’s address book. Still, the company’s statement doesn’t seem very sympathetic to people concerned about their privacy.

source: techcrunch.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top