South Sudan Conflict: A Test for the African Union

NAIROBI, Kenya – Even at this point – days after the trouble in South Sudan first erupted – there is much that is still not clear. That is only to be expected. Any crisis of this magnitude invariably produces at least two rival narratives about recent events in the troubled country, and who is to blame for the unfolding tragedy.

There is one thing, however, which can be stated with certainty: that the African Union has to intervene in the South Sudan crisis before the violence spirals out of control.

Kenyans are particularly well-placed to appreciate the need for outside intervention in the search for a peaceful resolution to a violent eruption of this kind.

When Kenya had an outbreak of post-election violence in 2008, there was virtually no communication between the rival political groups. Each side claimed to have won the election, and demanded that the rival group yield to its demands. It took the intervention of the international community and the wise mediation of a “group of eminent persons” led by former U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan before Kenya’s political equilibrium to be restored.

South Sudan now faces a crisis which may be different in its origins and the sequence in which the tragedy is playing out. But in its essentials, it is much the same thing: the nation is deeply divided, and there are those who refuse to be ruled by the man who is currently serving as the president.

If this crisis is to be prevented from degenerating into the kind of open civil war, such as there is in Syria at the moment, there must be an immediate intervention by mediators from beyond the borders of South Sudan.

The African Union has in recent months made all kinds of global headlines in its opposition to the International Criminal Court. And there has been the repeated declaration that “African solutions” can be found for African problems, without the need for “outsiders”.

Well, South Sudan offers just the kind of crisis that the AU can use to demonstrate its revolve in this matter of “finding African solutions”.

Source: The Kenya Star

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top