‘Glee’ Star Amber Riley Wins ‘Dancing With the Stars’

Amber Riley, star of the hit show “Glee,” won the 17th season of Dancing with the Stars thanks to a perfect score on the final three dance routines.

Riley beat out Corbin Bleu and Jack Osbourne.

She and professional dance partner Derrick Hough soared their way to the top after incredible Samba and Quickstep routines and they showed versatility with a sexy Charleston number.

After the victory, the young actress dished on the why she did the show.

“I didn’t know if I [could] do it and anything that scares me I wanna do,” she said. “So I want to let women of all sizes out there know you can do whatever you put your mind to. It doesn’t matter what size you are, what color you are, you can do whatever, whatever, whatever, whatever you put your mind to!”

Amber seemed to be quite a natural on the dance floor and it also helped that she had arguably one of the best coaches on the show in Hough, who now has five Mirror Ball Trophies.

Still, the 27-year-old starlet was a bit of an underdog coming into the competition as she had to battle a knee injury throughout most of the season.

Bleu, who was a favorite because of  his dance experience with Disney’s “High School Musical,” came in second.

“I thank God for this experience,” he said. “I thank my family; I thank my best partner in the world.”

Scores from judges and the show’s national audience determined the victor.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top