Mali Votes In Parliamentary Elections Amid High Security, Fear Of Violence

mali-election-1Mali is voting in parliamentary elections in a vote designed to seal the nation’s return to democracy in the wake of a military coup and Islamist insurgency. Security is high amid fears of violence.

Polling opened in Mali on Sunday in a parliamentary vote designed to solidify the nation’s fragile democracy, three months after the election of President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita.

Some 6.5 million people are eligible to elect the new national assembly, with more than 1,000 candidates, including 135 women, competing for 147 seats.

Voting began at 8 a.m. local time under heavy security as fears of reprisal attacks from Islamist militants hung over the occasion. The north of the country was of particular concern, where al Qaeda-linked militants are still active in the region.

A secessionist Tuareg uprising in the north of the country led to a military coup in March 2012 and the overthrow of President Amadou Toumani Toure. The Tuareg seized control of an area larger than France in the chaos that followed, only to be ousted by al Qaeda-linked Islamist groups. They, in turn, were driven out by a French-led ground and air offensive in January of this year, but have more recently resumed activity.

Dozens of Malian and Chadian soldiers in the United Nations’ MINUSMA peacekeeping mission have been killed in the country’s north in recent months.

Two French radio journalists were also kidnapped and killed by members of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb in the north’s lawless region of Kidal on November 2.

Source: DW.DE

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top