South Africa: Nelson Mandela’s Daughters Drop Legal Action

Nelson Mandela’s daughters have dropped a high-profile court battle to wrest control of two companies set up to manage proceeds from his iconic handprints, lawyers said Thursday.

Makaziwe and Zenani Mandela-Dlamini’s application to remove four directors appointed by their ailing father has been “unconditionally withdrawn” and costs paid, law firm Norton Rose Fulbright said in a statement.

“This ill-considered and misguided application had the effect of causing reputational harm not only to the respondents as directors and trustees, but also to the Trust and the image of the founder, Mr Nelson Mandela himself,” said the statement from the lawyers, who are representing the directors.

Mandela’s daughters had argued the trustees were not properly appointed to Harmonieux Investment Holdings and Magnifique Investment Holdings.

The two companies were set up to channel money from the sale of Mandela’s famous handprints for his family’s benefit.

The directors included human rights lawyer and Mandela’s personal friend George Bizos, former Cabinet minister Tokyo Sexwale and his ex-lawyer Bally Chuene.

“The unfounded allegations made by the applicants cast doubt upon the legitimacy of the appointment of these directors, which had been upon the express instructions of Mr Mandela,” they said through their lawyers. “This was unfortunate and regrettable.”

Earlier this year, lawyer Ismail Ayob — who himself has a chequered past with Mandela and was representing the daughters — withdrew from the case.

Ayob was removed from Mandela’s trust after selling fake artwork and pocketing millions of dollars. He paid back nearly $100,000 in a court settlement in 2007.

source: sapa.co.za

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top