Jordan: He Would’ve Beaten James in His Prime

jordan lebron

Michael Jordan believes that in his prime he could have won a one-on-one against LeBron James, but the NBA great isn’t too sure if he could have taken Kobe Bryant.

At a promoting event for NBA 2K14 video game, Jordan named a list of players he wishes he could have played one-on-one: Jerry West, Elgin Baylor, Julius Erving, Carmelo Anthony, Dwyane Wade, Bryant and James, who are also on the cover.

“I don’t think I would lose,” Jordan, said confidently, “other than to Kobe Bryant, because he steals all of my moves.”

After the media alerted James of Jordan’s comments, the 2013 NBA League MVP responded promptly. “MJ said that? I’ve thought about the matchup, but no one will ever see it and it’s not going to happen,” James said Tuesday after practice in Nassau, Bahamas. “It’s good for people to talk about.”

James then referred to Jordan’s comments as a good push to promote the video game.

“Where he’d say this at? Oh, it was for my game? It’s good promotion then,” James said.

Jordan has sponsorship deal with 2K Sports. He first partnered with the company in 2011, when he first was featured on the cover of the game.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top