List

5 Celebrities Who Are Dead Wrong on How to End Racism

By ABS Contributor | Published on September 11, 2013 | Updated on September 16, 2013 10:50 AM EDT

Kerry Washington thinks affirmative action levels the playing field for everyone.

Actress Kerry Washington put up a good defense for affirmative action on Bill Maher’s HBO talk show, “Real Time,” particularly about the need to level the playing field. The effects of the program have been tracked for many years, and when you look at the numbers, it has worked very well — just not for black people.

Since affirmative action was implemented, the wage gap between blacks and whites narrowed 1.2 percent every 1.5 decades. At this rate, black households won’t reach wage parity with whites for at least 200 years.
From 1985 to 2000, white men’s median wage rose 60 percent, black men’s 65 percent, and black women’s 70 percent: white women came well out on top with a 78 percent gain. White women’s big leap contributed greatly to blacks’ meager wage gain on whites.
White male unemployment rate in March was 8.9 percent and hit 19 percent for black men. Meanwhile, black women’s unemployment rate grew from 12.1 percent to 12.4 percent, but white women held fast at 7.3 percent – USAToday, April 6, 2010.

Obviously, white women have been the primary beneficiaries of affirmative action. But just as most white men share their income and assets with white women, most white women reciprocate with white men.

More to the point, the women share with their men their affirmative action financial benefit. This means, possibly, that by virtue of the huge number of white women assisted by affirmative action, white men are the program’s second biggest beneficiaries.

Subscribe To The ABS Newsletter — Get our stories in your inbox.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way