Jourdan Dunn Gets Naked for GQ, Clarifies Her ‘Ghetto’ Reputation

Jourdan Dunn strips down for her feature in the September issue of GQ magazine. The London-bred supermodel opened up to the men’s magazine about her reputation within the fashion industry and her flirting tactics, in case any brave man thinks he can win her heart.

GQ writer Mark Green notes:

“Forget the on-cue comparisons to also-British, also-black, also-brash Naomi Campbell. Jourdan Dunn is more like fashion’s Tupac—skullcap on, middle finger up, filter off. She’s ballsy, in addition to being absolutely, undeniably stunning, and a practitioner of the what-did-she-just-say? school of publicity.

“For example, her tweet after she supposedly proved too, um, big for a Paris runway show: ‘I’m normally told I’m cancelled because I’m ‘coloured’ so being cancelled because of my boobs is a minor.'”

Dunn’s reputation may precede her, but she appears to be okay with that, telling the magazine:

“People think that I’m against fashion—or that I’m ghetto or a loudmouth. I’m not. But if speaking my opinion makes me that girl, fine. I’ll take that crown.”

On the topic of dropping hints to a guy she likes:

“I think I play with my hair a lot. I’m not very touchy-feely, but I’ll probably be a bit touchy.”jourdan dunn 1

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top