Greg Jennings: Green Bay Packers ‘Brainwashed’ Me and Other Players

If you want to hear anything good about the Green Bay Packers, one person you shouldn’t ask is Greg Jennings.

Jennings seems to go out of his way to attack the Packers, claiming in an interview with Paul Allen and Ben Leber of KFAN Radio that the Packers organization “brainwashed” him and other players into thinking that other franchises are unfavorable.

“When I came over here, I kind of had, I was kind of brainwashed. There’s no ‘kind of’ to it. Being over in Green Bay, you’re brainwashed to think that anyone in the division is just tiers below.”

Jennings elaborated, “It’s like everything that you know in Green Bay is like the best, the best, the best, the best, the best. And it’s like total brainwashing. And I think you don’t open your eyes to see what other teams have to offer unless you are in that position.”

He claims the comment was innocent, but it goes against Vikings Head Coach Leslie  expressed wish that he wants Jennings to keep his focus on Minnesota.

Jennings left the Packers to sign a lucrative, five-year $47.5 million deal with the Vikings.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top