Will Google’s Chromecast Change TV Game?

Yesterday Google hosted their much-anticipated “Breakfast with Sandar Pichai” event. And while the release of the new Nexus 7 was the headliner, Google’s new TV dongle, Chromecast, has been generating a ton of buzz. At first glance, my feelings were mixed. While it was good news that there was another solution to get the internet to your TV— and competition is always good for the consumer—Chromecast still seemed to be ‘just another addition’ to the growing space. However, after giving it a closer look, two things make it really compelling – it’s cross platform and insanely cheap at only $35. As reported by fastcompany.com:

“Most streaming devices are a gateway between your TV and the Internet. They have their own interface, which often mimics an app store, and usually include a separate remote control. But Google’s Chromecast does the opposite: This $35 gadget turns your laptop, tablets, and phones into remote controls for viewing video, photos, music, and websites on your TV screen.

“It seems like an obvious solution to the Internet-on-television conundrum. But it’s not the first stick-sized device to try and think outside the streaming TV box. Roku, which was named one of our Most Innovative Companies this year, introduced its Streaming Stick in 2012. But that device only works with sets that have a newer MHL connection rather than simple HDMI. And there’s also Plair, a Wi-Fi-enabled dongle that can connect any smartphone to any television (that has a USB port). Both of these alternatives not only have drawbacks compared with Chromecast, but they cost $99, more than double what Google is charging.”

The $35 price is the real kicker for Google with Chromecast, because at that price it becomes an impulse buy with such a low barrier to entry, more people will be willing to give it a shot. It’s probably just what Google needs to help them compete with Apple TV. Because they haven’t been successful in the space previously as noted by forbes.com:

“Google hasn’t had much success thus far in its attempts to conquer the living room. Google TV has been a flop, and the spherical black Nexus Q streaming media device was basically killed before it hit the street.”

Well, now we have something a bit more promising. Also, the strategy aligns itself  more closely with Google’s product strategy: offer free or next-to-free products and they will provide you with advertising. Oops, I meant information, not advertising.

Check out the Google Chromecast video below and tell us what you think.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top