Ambulance With Ailing Mandela Broke Down En Route to Hospital

The ambulance that rushed former South African President Nelson Mandela to a hospital in the early hours of June 8 broke down, causing a delay while a replacement vehicle was dispatched.

The military ambulance experienced “engine problems” on the way to the hospital in Pretoria, Mac Maharaj, spokesman for President Jacob Zuma, said in a phone interview today, confirming a report by CBS News.

Medical staff attending to Mandela, 94, decided to transfer him to another vehicle, Maharaj said.

“Doctors ensured his health wasn’t compromised during the incident,” he said.

The CBS report says the transfer to another ambulance took place in freezing winter temperatures.

Mandela, also known by his clan name Madiba, is spending his 15th day in the hospital for treatment of a recurring lung infection.

It’s the fourth time he’s been hospitalized since December.

The presidency said in a statement on its website today that Mandela “remains in a serious but stable condition.”

Thabo Mbeki, who succeeded Mandela in 1999, said on June 20 that the former leader’s condition was improving, while the Johannesburg-based Star newspaper yesterday quoted his grandson, Ndaba Mandela, as saying he may be discharged from the hospital soon.

Read more: IT

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top