FBI’s Robert Mueller: Drones Are Being Used on US Soil

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is using drones on U.S. soil.

The admission by the agency’s director has sparked further debate over privacy vs. security in the United States.

FBI director Robert Mueller was put on the spot at a Senate hearing by a Republican senator on Wednesday.

Charles Grassley asked plainly: “Does the FBI use drones for surveillance on US soil?”
“Yes,” replied Mueller curtly.
Grassley continued, “I want to go onto a question…” as Mueller cuts in, “Well let me just put it in context now, in a very, very minimal way and very seldom.”

President Barack Obama admitted in May to the use of armed drones abroad, but authorities said domestic unmanned surveillance vehicles (UAV) did not carry weapons. However, Mueller did not say how many UAVs they had or how often they were used. It comes as the Obama administration faces scrutiny over its snooping into phone records at home and internet data abroad.

Drones are used to watch the Mexican border and in police pursuits as they are quieter and cheaper than traditional helicopters used for aerial views. The FBI cited a case where a boy was held hostage in a bunker in Alabama where UAVs were used. In each case they must get approval from the Federal Aviation authority and are confined to a ‘small geographic area’.

Source: euronews.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top