Dominican, Haiti Governments Square Off on Poultry Ban

The Dominican government Monday night called Haiti’s proposal to continue banning Dominican poultry products and allow only meats, “totally unacceptable.”  After a four-hour  meeting, officials from both countries failed to solve the one-week standoff.

After the meeting, Dominican Foreign Minister Carlos Morales said President Danilo Medina was told “in a very clear, very transparent and quite frankly, that they didn’t see much interest on the Haitian side.”

The visibly annoyed foreign minister, who headed the Dominican delegation in the meeting with Haiti to discuss lifting Port-au-Prince’s ban on chickens and eggs, said the Haitian officials called him during the weekend, and confirmed they were “coming to resolve.”

However, he said, yesterday’s proposal was “totally unacceptable,” because the Dominican government’s only priority is to lift the ban on poultry products, even if temporarily.

“It was an abrupt decision by them, when relations were supposedly quite cordial, and we learned it from the media, so we didn’t see much interest. We’re trying to find a solution,” he added.

When asked if the Haitian commission set a timeline to respond to the Dominican government, Morales said “they neither stated a term, nor do we believe in deadlines.”

On the standoff’s effect on binational ties, Morales declined comment, but noted: “Well, let’s wait, in this we must have … listen… first of all in diplomacy we should speak little, one must be cautious, I think prudence is the best counselor now. ”

The official spoke in the National Palace accompanied by Presidency Chief of  Staff Gustavo Montalvo and Agriculture minister Luis Ramon Rodriguez.

Source:  Dominican Today

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top