UN Anti-Cholera Plan in Haiti Failing

United Nations’ efforts to tackle cholera in Haiti are “almost non-existent”, a charity says, as the world body faces court action for inadvertently starting a cholera epidemic in the country.

Late last year, the UN launched a $2.2 billion-appeal to improve water supplies in Haiti.

But Medecins Sans Frontieres says this has had almost no practical effect.

The U.N. is accused of negligently allowing peacekeeping soldiers to pollute Haiti’s water with cholera.

The epidemic, which is spread by infected sewage, has killed more than 8,000 people since late 2010.

‘Alarming’ situation

“There have been grand plans – a 10-year $2.2 billion project,” Duncan McClean, a senior manager for MSF, told the BBC.

But the U.N. plan had not been implemented, he added.

“I travel regularly to Haiti; the impact on the ground today is almost non-existent.”

The UN plan to improve drinking water and sewage outlets – which MSF says is unfulfilled – was widely seen as the international body’s attempt to deflect calls by the victims of cholera for financial compensation.

The multibillion dollar compensation claim is unprecedented in UN history.

The U.N. says it has legal immunity from the compensation case; the mission in Haiti generally declines to comment on the matter – saying it is in the hands of U.N. lawyers.

The BBC has sought a U.N. comment on the MSF allegation about the failings of its cholera plan, but has not yet received one.

Lawyers for the cholera victims say that unless talks on compensation begin in the next few weeks, they will take the U.N. to court in New York.

MSF said the cholera situation in Haiti was currently “extremely alarming.” The rainy season had begun – causing the usual flooding of infected open sewers – while donor countries had reduced aid commitments.

Source: BBC

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top