David Ortiz Claims Racism Part of PED Insinuations

David Ortiz, the Boston Red Sox slugger, said that a Boston Globe column questioning whether his strong start to the season has been aided by performance-enhancing drugs is ethnically discriminatory.

“What is the point of criticizing someone who is working hard and trying to do it right?” Ortiz told an ESPN Deportes Radio affiliate in the Dominican Republic, reacting to the column by Dan Shaughnessy of the Globe.

The column casts Ortiz as suspect of cheating because he’s hitting well at his age (37), has suffered an injury (Achilles tendon) consistent with steroid use and is from the Dominican Republic, where a number of players have tested positive for PEDs.

“Yesterday, the guy came to see me and asked some questions about steroids, and when you see the writing, it basically focuses on the fact that I’m Dominican and that many Dominicans have been caught using steroids. And what about the Americans?” Ortiz said.

“If you’re from the Middle East, because there are some people there who put bombs and terrorize civilians, I have to see you like that, as well? If you are a white American, I have to call you a racist because white Americans were in the Ku Klux Klan?

“The thing that stung me was his statement about Dominicans. You mean that in Dominican Republic there are no players who try to do things right? We are all in the same boat. And the people here who have been caught, does that put everyone here in the same boat?”

Ortiz shared his thoughts in a recorded conversation for the “Grandes en los Deportes” (“Big in Sports”) talk show.

“I have spent many years in Boston and still do not know the right way to do things: Do it right or do it wrong,” Ortiz said. “If you do it wrong, they’ll finish you. If you’re doing well, they’ll finish you, too. There’s no area where you feel safe.”

Ortiz, who said he is a “big, firm believer” in Major League Baseball’s drug-testing program, told ESPN’s Pedro Gomez on Wednesday that he was tested for PEDs on Tuesday night. Ortiz also told the Globe he has been tested “probably” five times this season.

Ortiz told Gomez he never has entertained the idea of using PEDs.

“This is a stage in my career that it’s never crossed my mind … to get involved with anything related to PEDs,” Ortiz said.

Ortiz has been linked to PEDs in the past.

The New York Times reported in 2009 that he tested positive for PEDs during the 2003 season. Ortiz later said a combination of then-legal supplements and vitamins likely caused a positive test.

“I’ve had a couple of bad Aprils and they have tried to bring me to the point of suicide, but the seasons have continued, and I got better and finished with good numbers, but they have continued talking about the bad Aprils. Now I’m having a good April and they attack me anyhow,” Ortiz told the radio show.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top