Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Editor's Picks
Editor's PicksNewsVideoWorld

With Hunger Strike, Will Obama now Close Guantanamo?

Posted byBy ABS Contributor | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

The closing of the Guantanamo Bay detention center was a top priority for Barack Obama during his first term as U.S. president, but since he began his second term, he has barely spoken of it.

The prison in Cuba was left largely out of public discourse in the United States. But a now a three-month hunger strike by more than 100 detainees has changed that.

As the strike by detainees protesting their indefinite detention continues, the Pentagon has cleared the way for the force feeding of 20 detainees, a move supported by Obama.

However, the American Medical Association, the largest association of  American physicians, has sent a letter to Chuck Hagel,  U.S. secretary of defense, protesting the force feedings, saying they violate medical ethics.

“We urge you to ensure that this matter receives prompt and thorough attention to address any situation in which a physician may be asked to violate the ethical standards of his or her profession,” read the AMA letter.

But one Pentagon spokesman told Carol Rosenberg, a Miami Herald reporter, that it is “un-American” to let a detainee starve and that it “violates the very code of civilized peoples everywhere”.

So, has the strike tipped the scales so that it is finally time for justice?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top