ANC Criticized Over Video of Ailing Nelson Mandela

Footage of Nelson Mandela looking frail and unsmiling while surrounded by laughing politicians has provoked accusations that he is being exploited by the South African government.

The first video of the former president in nearly nine months shows him in an armchair, his head propped up by a pillow, his legs on a footrest.

His face seems drained of colour, with his cheeks showing what appear to be marks from a recently removed oxygen mask.

South Africa President Jacob Zuma’s visit to Mandela was organized by the governing African National Congress, which has previously been criticized for secrecy around Mandela’s health.

There was a swift backlash from South Africans on Twitter, with many accusing the ANC of callously manipulating the 94-year-old.

Khaya Dlanga, a blogger and columnist, said the footage of Mandela being “paraded” in front of cameras reminded him of a photo taken on Robben Island. “He looked like a man who didn’t want to be there. Everyone around him was all smiles but him. It was so hard and painful to see.”

Twitter user Brent Lindeque posted: “After everything Madiba has done for us, this is how they treat him. Like an animal at the zoo. Shame on the ANC.”

Far from allaying fears over Mandela’s health, the ANC’s strategy appeared to have backfired. Radio presenter Aki Anastasiou tweeted: “He looks so frail. I wish they’d just leave him in peace.”

During the film, Mandela is urged to “smile, smile” as one of his grandsons grabs a mobile phone to take a picture. Mandela attempts a weak smile but, as the flash goes off, he closes his eyes. His eyes are sensitive after years of work in a limestone quarry.

Source: The Gaurdian

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top