‘Amazing Spider-Man 2’: Max Dillon and Harry Osborn First Look

Two official images from Marvel’s upcoming film “The Amazing Spider-Man 2“ have been debuted via Twitter accounts of director Marc Webb and actor Dane DeHaan. The two share the first look at two characters, super-villain Max Dillon and Norman Osborn’s son, Harry Osborn, who makes an appearance in the film as Peter Parker’s old friend.

In one of the images, Jamie Foxx is featured as Max Dillon before his physical transformation into blue Electro. With a caption that reads “Day 52. My name is Max”, the image hints that the glasses-wearing Dillon is obsessed with Spider-Man, as a Spidey poster is right behind him.

Meanwhile, DeHaan proudly presents to fans the new look of Harry Osborn, who was previously played by James Franco in Sam Raimi’s “Spider-Man” films. The new Harry Osborn appears to be a young gentleman as he sports a grey checkered suit. Giving a menacing look to someone before getting into the car, baggy-eyed Osborn seems quite tired for some reason.

The sequel to “The Amazing Spider-Man” still follows Peter Parker busy taking out the bad guys as Spider-Man and spending time with the person he loves, Gwen. Peter hasn’t forgotten the promise he made to Gwen’s father to protect her by staying away – but that’s a promise he just can’t keep.

Things will change for Peter when a new villain, Electro, emerges, an old friend, Harry Osborn, returns, and Peter uncovers new clues about his past.

Read more:  aceshowbiz.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top