Trending Topics

Dr. Kermit Gosnell Trial: The Prosecution Rests

After five weeks of difficult and gruesome testimony, the prosecution rested in the murder trial of Dr. Kermit Gosnell. Defense attorney Jack McMahon will now have the chance to lay out his case to the jury. Here’s a look back at the courtroom action from week five.

Prosecutors accuse the 72-year-old doctor of running a rogue clinic that ignored the state ban on third-term abortions and 24-hour waiting periods and maimed desperate, often poor women and teens by letting his untrained staff perform abortions and give anesthesia. He is accused of  using outmoded drugs and unorthodox methods to force women to endure labor and  deliver live babies who were killed with scissors by staff.

“The standard practice here was to slay babies. That’s what they did,” said Assistant District Attorney Joanne Pescatore in her opening statement, repeating a 2011 grand jury report that called the clinic “a house of horrors.”

Prosecutors say Gosnell profited handsomely — police found $250,000 in cash during a 2010 search of his home.

Gosnell is charged with killing seven babies born alive, and also with the death of Karnamaya Mongar, a 41-year-old refugee from Bhutan. According to the prosecution, Gosnell’s staff gave the 90-pound woman a lethal dose of anesthesia and painkillers during a 2009 abortion.

Dave Weigel of Slate theorized that political journalists “are, generally, pro-choice….There is a bubble. Horror stories of abortionists are less likely to permeate that bubble than, say, a story about a right-wing pundit attacking an abortionist who then claims to have gotten death threats … a reporter in the bubble is less likely to be compelled by the news of an arrested abortionist.”

So far, several patients and about a half dozen former employees have testified about the conditions at the clinic as prosecutors continue to call witnesses this week in their campaign to seek the death penalty against Gosnell.

In Gosnell’s defense, his lawyers say he is the target of a “prosecutorial lynching” in a case that is “elitist and racist.”

“This is a targeted, elitist and racist prosecution of a doctor who’s done nothing but give (back) to the poor and the people of West Philadelphia,” the fiery lawyer Jack McMahon said to the predominantly black jury in his opening arguments. “It’s a prosecutorial lynching of Dr. Kermit Gosnell.”

McMahon claimed that the prosecution was applying “Mayo Clinic” standards to Gosnell’s inner-city office in West Philadelphia. He said Gosnell performed as many as 1,000 abortions a year, and at least 16,000 over his long career, and had a lower-than-average complication rate.

Meanwhile, a report by the Guttmacher Institute finds that lawmakers around the country are now intent on banning abortions rather than simply regulating them.

During the first quarter of 2013, according to the report, 694 provisions on reproductive health and rights were introduced, and 93 of these had been approved by one or more legislative bodies. Guttmacher is a pro-abortion rights nonprofit organization that tracks abortion legislation and conducts quarterly analyses.

Read more here: Trial of Abortion Doctor Gosnell Sparks Debate About Media Coverage

What people are saying

2 thoughts on “Dr. Kermit Gosnell Trial: The Prosecution Rests

  1. The sad fact is that by blowing the Gosnell killings of born babies into something they were not, "mass murder" the prosecution may lose credibility. I think a more reasoned prosecution would have been wise.

  2. Chris Smith says:

    Russel I dont get what your saying here

Leave a Reply

Back to top