Another Member of SEAL Team 6 Dishes on Bin Laden Mission

Another member of SEAL Team 6, the military squad responsible for the killing of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, has come forward to share the story of the infamous mission. Speaking to CNN national security analyst Peter Bergen, the anonymous SEAL criticized the record of the bin Laden’s death given to Esquire magazine, saying that “The Shooter” identified in Esquire was not the person who fired the key shot that downed the 9/11 conspirator.

CNN’s source was not the first to question the Esquire account, which has been contradicted by reports from former Navy SEAL Brandon Webb, and a book from another SEAL Team 6 member, Matt Bissonnette. The questionable accuracy of the varying stories has made the mission a target of unwanted attention, specifically in the eyes of military officials who worked to keep the story out of the public.

It also calls for a closer look at the team responsible for the military’s most critical missions. The SEAL who spoke to Bergen recounted Team 6’s debriefing with President Barack Obama after bin Laden’s death, during which the team’s commander focused on the importance of the entire team.

“If you took one person out of the puzzle, we wouldn’t have the competence to do the job we did; everybody’s vital,” the commander of SEAL Team 6 said. “It’s not about the guy who pulled the trigger to kill bin Laden, it’s about what we all did together.”

Bergen concludes that while the first team members to reach the al-Qaeda leader have been identified, it may be impossible to determine who delivered the fatal wounds. It has been two years since the mission that led military forces to bin-Laden’s compound in Pakistan.  Oscar-nominated historical drama Zero Dark Thirty presented a loose story of the mission last year.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top