Trending Topics

China President Xi Travels to Africa to Counter Claims of Colonialism

Chinese President Xi Jinping used his first overseas trip to travel to Africa and address head-on the growing perception that his nation’s expanding presence in Africa is leading to a new form of colonialism.

In a speech in Tanzania, the new president promised more equality in the trade relationship with Africa and said China’s presence would lead to more development on the continent. The mere fact that Xi chose Africa for his first trip underscored the importance of African oil and natural resources to the Chinese economy.

“Africa belongs to the African people,” Xi said. “In developing relations with Africa, all countries should respect Africa’s dignity and independence.”

Xi is scheduled to meet today in South Africa with that country’s president, Jacob Zuma, and then attend a summit of the BRICS countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa—on Thursday in the South African port city of Durban. The BRICS nations will be discussing plans to create a multinational lender to rival the World Bank.

China’s trade with Africa reached nearly $200 billion in 2012, an increase of more than 19 percent from 2011, according to the New York Times, quoting from Chinese government figures. Most of that figure is made up of oil, ore and other commodities from Angola, Nigeria and other resource-rich countries.

There has been a growing chorus of voices, such as Botswana President Ian Khama and Nigerian central bank governor Lamido Sanusi, questioning the imbalance in China’s relationship with Africa.

“So China takes our primary goods and sells us manufactured ones,” Sanusi wrote in the Financial Times. “This was also the essence of colonialism. The British went to Africa and India to secure raw materials and markets. Africa is now willingly opening itself up to a new form of imperialism.”

But China has plenty of defenders.

Adams Bodomo, African Studies director at Hong Kong University, says claims of neo-colonialism are overblown and that China’s influence “was more positive than negative.”

“In 10 years, China has built a lot more infrastructure than, for example, Britain did in my own country— Ghana—for 100 years,” Bodomo said.

Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete was dismissive of the criticisms. He told Chinese reporters that Africa’s relationship with China was no different than with any other major power.

“Why when we have relations with the others there is no problem?” Kikwete asked. “But when we have relations with China, oh boy! So many questions!”

Tanzania looks “for investments, technology, markets and development assistance,” Kikwete said, adding: “This is all we are getting from China. Our relationship with China is about that. With the U.S. is about that, with Europe is about that, with Japan is about that, with India is about that. So if the issue is neo-colonialism then it is with everybody,” he said.

“Trade has increased tremendously between China and Tanzania,” he said. “And also, I agree with you, that China sells more to Tanzania than what Tanzania sells to China. This is something that we need to change. But how do you change that? We have an acute supply-side constraint. There is so much we can do but we cannot do it now because our major constraint is investment.”

What people are saying

3 thoughts on “China President Xi Travels to Africa to Counter Claims of Colonialism

  1. At least China is building infrastructure and giving back, unlike Brit.

  2. That's the least China could do is build infrastructure after raping numerous countries blind, taking their natural resources and not allowing these countries to have the majority voice when it comes to economic and trade decisions. China is essentially doing the same thing countless other nations have been doing for centuries, ROBBING AFRICA! Quick question for those who disagree… Why is it that Africa is the richest continent on the planet when it comes to resources, yet it is economically the poorest? Makes no sense. Yet you have places like Belgium bringing in 250 million a day worth of diamonds through their ports? Where are the diamonds coming from? This is just one example

  3. Kitosan Gabz says:

    China's only been on the African scene for a few decennies.
    If we follow your logic, the 'least' the West could do is build suspension bridges between the African nations and the planets of the solar system. (lolz).
    'Raping' countries blind and 'taking' natural resources for free has been the trademark practice of whities and their imperialst-capitalism, NOT that of the Chinese…
    Western corruption of African leaders has always been funded by the very raw resources of Africa while the funds have all ended up in Switzerland and later back in whities' hands…
    Since your example cites Belgium, it is not pertinent when it comes to explaining Africa's sorry state and China's model of cooperation.
    Having to deal with most of the trash mis-leaders (which the West gladly support when they haven't implanted them), the Chinese model and choice of infrastructural investments is a wise move to neutrally ensure that as much benefits as possible are trickled down to the African people and the development of their nations.
    Infrastructure empowers Africans to flow goods amongst themselves rather than depend on Western imports and along with the spread of better communication, ideas and information can also flow better and hopefully empower Africans to grasp the source of their predicaments and their need to tackle their elites and the flawed systems that the West has imposed there…

    Now, IF that's unfair, where are our other options please?

    Possibly, the deals could be even more beneficial to the black continent but, at least -with the cooperation of China- in a few years, most of us have busted through (and way beyond) the "developing" countries' status that the West has kindly doctored and maintained for us over the past 50 years with the help of their 'fiat currencies' and the dictates of 'their' fraudulent institutions such as the IMF and 'World' Bank…
    Meanwhile, China also owns US bonds worth over 1/3 of the USD 15+ trillions' debt of the self-acclaimed 'most powerful nation on Earth' and they're nowhere near the day they'll see that money again.
    Now, do we see the Chinese imposing sanctions; dictating privatization policies or financing terrorism and civil conflicts to rob the US of its resources?
    If the answer is 'NO', let China do its thing and channel your efforts towards getting the world rid of white supremacy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top