Another Lance Armstrong Movie is in the Works

The revelation of record-breaking cyclist Lance Armstrong’s steroid use over the years has had many ripple effects on pop culture. People are talking about doping and athletes, and Armstrong’s morality, and so on and so forth. Strangely, no one has questioned the wisdom of “being good at a sport” as solid criteria for role model-dom, but that’s America.

Of course, on of the predictable outcomes was the announcement that Hollywood would be turning the story into a movie. Paramount has one in the works, which has been rumored to have Bradley Cooper in talks to star as Armstrong. Now, Warner Bros has decided that they want a piece of the action as well.

WB has teamed up with Atlas Entertainment, screenwriter Scott Burns, and director Jay Roach for the film, which has no title as of yet. They’ve also acquired the life rights to Tyler Hamilton, who rode alongside Armstrong for many years, and who originally broke the news of the doping conspiracy on 60 Minutes.

Do we really need two Armstrong doping movies? No, of course not. We’ll see which one turns out to be good (because let’s face it – in a dueling film scenario, there are never two good ones).

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top