Demi Moore Wants Half Of Ashton Kutcher's Gelt

The first round of divorce court has started in the Demi Moore/Kutcher Kutcher case, and the actress is seeking to take the Two And A Half Men actor to the bank. Earlier today, in a Los Angeles Superior Court, Moore asked the judge to have her ex pay both spousal support and attorney fees.

The couple spilt over a year ago citing “irreconcilable differences,” and now it looks as though the two may end up going through a lengthy courtroom battle over the financial terms.

Kutcher is reportedly worth $140 million. Last year alone, he earned $24 million from the CBS hit show Two and a Half Men. However, Moore is worth more than Kutcher, reportedly being worth $150 million.

So if Moore is worth more than Kutcher why would she seek spousal support? It might have all to do with Kutcher, who has since their break-up, been seen parading around with his That ’70s Show costar Mila Kunis, who is his new girlfriend. Kutcher was even spotted with Kunis in his hometown in Iowa over the Christmas vacation with his family.  A wise man would always say, “never get a new girlfriend until the ink on your divorce papers is dry.”

Kutcher nor Moore has yet commented on this case more details coming soon…

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top