'Dawn of the Planet of the Apes' Gets a Lead

Jason Clarke might be on the cusp of going from being a “that guy” to a bona-fide movie star. After years of minor roles (or leads in minor TV shows), the Australian actor has finally received some significant attention for Zero Dark Thirty. In that film, he plays a CIA interrogator who’s quite genial when he’s not inflicting horrific torture on prisoners (actually, he’s often kind of genial even when he’s doing that). He’s won a lot of deserved praise for the part, which, like everything else in the film, is nuanced and thoughtful.

Now, Clarke has signed on to star in Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, the upcoming sequel to 2011’s surprisingly good Rise of the Planet of the Apes. The movie picks up 15 years after the first one left off, and features intelligent ape Caesar (Andy Serkis) trying to lead his group of other sapient simians, while a conclave of humans struggle to survive in a world ravaged by a deadly virus. It is unknown at this point whether Clarke will be playing a human or donning a mo-cap suit as one of the apes. But he’ll probably be a human. The movie, directed by Cloverfield and Let Me In helmer Matt Reeves, is aiming for a 2014 release date.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top