‘Zero Dark Thirty’ Matches The Real-Life Drama And The Film Buzz

Jessica Chastain portrays the C.I.A. intel officer who leads the charge to find Osama Bin Laden’s courier, who will lead her (and the might of the U.S. armed services) to Bin Laden.

All the buzz Zero Dark Thirty has been getting is spot on. The movie cut down 10 years of the manhunt for the most hated man in America into a modest 160 minutes, and I wouldn’t wish for a single frame to be changed. The C.I.A. is portrayed as a bureaucratic quagmire at times. I imagine that is not far from the truth. Even if you are the most hardcore news junkie, you will still be startled by certain explosive scenes.

Chastain’s character, Maya, is committed to the mission with an abundance of confidence and a pinch of obsessive-compulsive disorder. She is headstrong, and will not back down to get the most dangerous man on the planet. Maya wears multiple hats, including researcher and private eye. She is a major firecracker and stands out in Islamabad or Washington, D.C.

Although I liked Chastain’s performance, I got a real kick out of Jason Clarke (Dan). He shows Maya the ropes in the early days of the detainee program, torturing captured terrorists while Maya sheepishly stands in the corner. Dan was her biggest believer besides herself. In one scene Dan is standing at a cage housing several monkeys. One monkey takes his ice cream cone, causing Dan to grin. A soldier laughs at this, saying “you agency guys.” In the background are captured fighters in orange jumpsuits. I don’t know why that particular scene stands out to me. Perhaps it is because moments before and after, Dan is interrogating a detainee; or it was Dan simply trying to retain his humanity in the midst of a war of ideals…

Read More: moviesonline.ca

 

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top