South Sudan Army ‘Shoots Down UN Helicopter’

The UN says a helicopter from its peacekeeping mission in South Sudan has been shot down by the army, killing all four crew, believed to be Russians.

A spokesman said the aircraft was shot down while on a reconnaissance mission in eastern Jonglei state.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon strongly condemned the attack on the “clearly marked” helicopter.

However, South Sudan’s minister of information told the BBC that the cause of the incident was not clear.

The UN has been helping those caught up in deadly clashes between rival communities in Jonglei state.

Deputy UN spokesman Eduardo del Buey said South Sudan’s military had admitted it had hit the helicopter.

“Initial reports indicated the UN helicopter crashed and burned. The mission immediately launched a search and recovery mission. It has confirmed the death of all four crew members,” the UN spokesman said.

“In subsequent communications between the mission and the South Sudanese armed forces, the SPLA [army] told the mission that it has shot down the helicopter in the Likuangole area in Jonglei state.”

A spokesman for Mr Ban said: “The secretary-general strongly condemns the shooting down today of a clearly marked UN helicopter by the Sudan People’s Liberation Army near Likuangole, in Jonglei State of South Sudan.”

Mr Ban called on South Sudan’s government to “immediately carry out an investigation and bring to account those responsible for this act”, the spokesman said.

Earlier, South Sudan military spokesman Philip Aguer told AFP news agency that the helicopter had been hit by “friendly fire”.

“The artillery unit unfortunately fired on the plane [believing] that this is an enemy plane because there was no prior information from the UN about this plane being in the area,” he said.

“After 15 minutes of shooting at the plane, we heard that the UN had sent a plane,” he added.

Read more: BBC

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top