Kevin Clash Faces Fourth Accuser As Warner Brothers Cancels His Film

As accusations of underage sexual relationships continue to mount against Kevin Clash, Warner Brothers has unsurprisingly cancelled its plans for a feature film starring a children’s character designed by the Elmo puppeteer. An anonymous fourth accuser has filed a lawsuit in New York’s federal court, claiming emotional, mental and psychological damage stemming from his underage affair with Clash. Lawyer Jeff Herman, who is representing two of the three other accusers, has scheduled a press conference for 1 p.m. Monday to further discuss the new allegations.

According to TMZ, the new suit says that the unidentified accuser met Clash in “late 1995 or early 1996” in Miami at the age of 16 or 17. Later Clash flew “John Doe” to New York, and had sex with him while providing the young man with money and a place to stay.

“According to our lawsuit, Kevin Clash knowingly paid to transport a minor across state lines for the purpose of satisfying his sexual interests.” Herman said in a press release.

Clash has only admitted to having a relationship with his first accuser, but denied that it ever involved underage sex. A settlement was reached with Sheldon Stephens, the first man to come forward, but the other three men are seeking heavy damages from the Sesame Street star.

Warner Brothers is no doubt looking to distance itself as much as possible as the scandal surrounding Clash continues to grow. Clash’s proposed project would have been a “Calvin and Hobbes kind of movie about a kid and his stuffed animal that takes on a life of its own because of the child’s imagination,” according to a developmental document shared with Vulture.

It is highly unlikely that Clash’s brainchild will ever see the light of day, and his career as an entertainer of children, much like his tenure on Sesame Street, is now over.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top