Do Men ‘Steal’ Good Ideas from Women?

Do men “steal” good ideas from women? One theory is that work is a game for men. Men and women work very much like they played as children. Men are energized by competing to win – at work just as in the games they played as boys. The good idea put on the table is the “ball.” The woman left it there, so it is fair to pick it up and run with it.

I think the man’s behavior in such a situation is rarely this conscious. Maybe the good idea was heard at a subconscious or subliminal level, not clearly at the conscious level. So the man actually thinks it is his idea when it comes out of his mouth. Why would the woman’s idea not have been clearly heard? The way women tend to talk at work provides an explanation.

Little girls are taught to “share” and “wait their turn.” In business meetings, research shows, women talk less than men. A woman may wait her turn, which may not come. Or she may speak succinctly, not wanting to take up more than her “fair share” of time. It is harder for some women to interrupt – or to take the floor back when interrupted. Women, more than men, get the feedback on performance evaluations, “Does not speak up in meetings.” If a woman has behaved this way in meetings, others may simply not anticipate powerful contributions. So they may simply not pay attention to her great ideas.

Read the full story at ForbesWomen.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top