Third Elmo Lawsuit Emerges Against Puppeteer

A third lawsuit has surfaced against Elmo puppeteer Kevin Clash. The third accuser, known simply as John Doe, claims he and clash had sexual relations when he was only 16.

The unknown accuser, communicating through his attorney Jeff Herman added he met the longtime Elmo puppeteer on a gay chat service about 13 years ago and the two of them had sex at Clash’s New York apartment.

Last week 24-year-old Cecil Singleton filed a lawsuit against Clash for more than $5 million in damages, alleging that he and Clash had inappropriate contact when Singleton was 15. Clash resigned as the voice of Elmo after the first allegation—Sheldon Stephens claimed he had sex with Clash when he was 16. But Stephens recanted his story after reaching a settlement with lawyers, then changed his mind and said he regretted the recanting and that he was pressured into it for a $125,000 settlement.

The latest accuser said Clash identified himself as Craig and plied him with alcohol while they engaged in sexual activity in his Manhattan apartment—where the teen could see “numerous Elmo dolls and photographs of Elmo with famous people such as Beyonce and Tyra Banks.” Clash kept in touch with the teen, who moved to New York and continued their relationship after he graduated from high school and turned 18, according to the suit.

Read the full story at Atlantablackstar.com

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top