Parliamentary Assembly of the 79-member African Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group of States

THE 30th session of the Parliamentary Assembly of the 79-member African Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) group of states is scheduled to take place in Paramaribo, Suriname over two days this coming weekend.

This meeting of the tri-continental group’s parliamentarians will precede the ACP’s Seventh Summit of Heads of State and Government, scheduled for December 13-14 in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea, with a work agenda driven by the central theme: “The Future of the ACP Group in a Changing World—Challenges and Opportunities”.

Disappointingly, however, the 14 independent member countries of Caricom—the regional economic integration movement that was quite influential in the inauguration of the ACP back in 1975, is likely to have low-level representations for both the meeting of MPs in Suriname and the summit in Africa.

Disappointment lies in the reality that all governments, leading institutions and representative civil society organizations so often passionately point to the serious challenges facing us as a sub-region of what used to be categorized as the Third World.

Currently, like its partners in Africa and the Pacific, the Greater Caribbean bloc of states (including Cuba and the Dominican Republic) are struggling for survival in a worsening global environment of economic recession, political/military conflicts, expanding criminality and climbing joblessness.

It is, therefore, self-evident that this is the time for the region to be more forthcoming in stimulating leadership committed to deepening and widening the functions and representational profile of the ACP rather than, as it appears, to spread disillusionment and, worse, be languishing in a retreat mode.

Having been founded in 1975 on the basis of what’s known as “The Georgetown Accord” to more effectively deal with trade and economic relations with the European Union (EU), successive governments of the ACP have come to be aware of the necessity to function in a wider international environment and seek structured relationships, such as, for instance, the powerful G-20 group.

The ACP group of 79 countries represents a population of some 2.5 billion people and vast resources, compared with the EU’s approximate 500 million population.

But the EU’s voice and influence are well represented at both the level of the G-8 group as well as within the wider G-20, broadened in recent years to include Brazil and South Africa.

 

Need for wider and more effective involvement in a changing world is clearly a priority challenge to be faced. It is, therefore, to the credit of the organizers of the forthcoming ACP Summit to focus on a central theme of this nature.

And, having so miserably failed the Caribbean region by a shocking absence of Heads of State and Government at the Sixth ACP Summit in Ghana in 2008—notable exception being the then Surinamese president — Ronald Venetiaan —it is to be expected that the Caricom leaders would avoid any repetition of such political detachment, if not contempt, in preparation for next month’s summit.

Yesterday I sought a brief comment from Sir Shridath Ramphal on the Caribbean’s apparent lackluster attitude towards the coming ACP group’s Parliamentary Assembly as well as the seventh summit in Africa.

Read the rest of this story here

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top