Kevin Clash’s Accuser Recants Story

The man that accused Elmo voice actor Kevin Clash of having sex with him when he was underage has recanted his story. The accuser released a statement through his lawyers on Tuesday. “He wants it to be known that his sexual relationship with Mr. Clash was an adult consensual relationship,” according to a statement issued by Andreozzi & Associates. “He will have no further comment on the matter.”

The unnamed accuser originally claimed he and Clash had a sexual relationship when he was 16-years-old. Clash has maintained his innocence and took a voluntary leave from Sesame Street on Monday to deal with the matter. “I am a gay man. I have never been ashamed of this or tried to hide it but felt it was a personal and private matter. I had a relationship with the accuser. It was between two consenting adults, and I am deeply saddened that he is trying to characterize it as something other than what it was,” he said in a statement after the scandal became public. “I am taking a break from Sesame Workshop to deal with this false and defamatory allegation.”

Sesame Street Workshop launched their own investigation and said Clash had been disciplined for “personal relationship unrelated to the workplace” and had exercised “poor judgement.”

Since the recantation, Clash released a statement saying he wants to put the incident behind him. “I am relieved that this painful allegation has been put to rest. I will not discuss it further,” he said in a statement. There were no charges filed and there is no word on when Clash will return to Sesame Street but the company has released a statement on the outcome of the situation. “We are pleased that this matter has been brought to a close, and we are happy that Kevin can move on from this unfortunate episode,” Sesame Street Workshop said in a statement.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top