Elmo Puppeteer Kevin Clash Denies He Had Sex With Teenage Boy

Elmo Puppeteer – Kevin Clash, the voice actor behind Sesame Street’s Elmo, is being accused of having a sexual relationship with an underage teenage boy. According to a report by TMZ, Clash’s accuser claims he had sexual relationship with Clash seven years ago when he was 16 and Clash was 45. Clash admitted to having a sexual relationship with his accuser but he insists the young man, now 23, was of consenting age. “I had a relationship with [the accuser],” Clash said in a statement. “It was between two consenting adults and I am deeply saddened that he is trying to make it into something it was not.”

Clash has taken a leave of absence from Sesame Street Workshop and the company has released a statement on the matter. “In June of this year, Sesame Workshop received a communication from a young man who alleged that he had a relationship with Kevin Clash beginning when he was 16-years-old,” said a Sesame Street rep in a statement. “This was a personal relationship, unrelated to the workplace. We took the allegation very seriously and took immediate action.”

The company also insists that Elmo will not be affected by this scandal. “Elmo is bigger than any one person and will continue to be an integral part of Sesame Street to engage, educate and inspire children around the world,” said the statement.

The alleged victim is being represented by Andreozzi and Associates, a firm that represented one of Jerry Sandusky’s accusers. Back in August, the firm sent a letter to Sesame Street accusing them of  attempting to “discredit the victim in order to protect its employee and the image of one of its most valuable characters.This approach places a greater value on a puppet than the well being of a young man.”

So far, there have been no charges filed against Clash.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top