Christian Feminist Writer Creates Controversy With Book About Her Attempt to Live ‘Biblically’ for a Year

Evangelical Christian writer Rachel Held Evans has stirred up controversy with her latest book, titled “A Year of Biblical Womanhood.” The book is an attempt to take a look at real women in the bible and how they are similar to women of today.

For the past year, Rachel Evans has worn a scarf over her head, called her husband “master, and stood on the roadside with a sign that said “Dan is awesome” in attempt to live in the model of biblical women.

Evans is a popular Christian blogger from Dayton, Tennessee. “A Year of Biblical Womanhood” is her second book after her first release in 2010, titled, “Evolving in Monkey Town.”

Her latest book tells the story of her extreme 1-year experiment of living her life according to tenets of the Bible. Describing herself as a feminist, Evans admitted that she couldn’t “sew a button on a blouse” before the experiment began.

Evans temporarily changed her life in order to gain a better understanding of the teachings in the Bible that are geared towards women, and what “assumptions” some make about female behavior.

“I’ve long been frustrated by the inconsistencies with which ‘biblical womanhood’ is taught and applied in my evangelical Christian community,” Evans said in a press release. “So, inspired by A.J. Jacobs’ ‘A Year of Living Biblically,’ I set out to follow all of the Bible’s instructions for women as literally as possible for a year to show that no woman, no matter how devout, is actually practicing biblical womanhood all the way.”
Read more: Brittney R. Villalva, Christian Post

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top