Ban on Samsung Galaxy Nexus Reversed

The preliminary injunction banning the sale of Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus was overturned on Thursday by a U.S. appeals court, the latest step in the ongoing legal battle between Apple and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. A February lawsuit filed by Apple accused Samsung of infringing on eight different patents and successfully requested that a California district court ban the sale of the Samsung smartphones that were guilty of infringement. Thursday’s decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit claims that the district court overstepped its boundaries and “abused its discretion in entering an injunction.” The case has been sent back to the district court for reconsideration.

Samsung scored a temporary victory with a stay on the injunction, but the current patent dispute with Apple is far from over. The potential ramifications would affect not only the two leading manufacturers; but also the smartphone industry as a whole companies fight to determine the boundaries of their patents and overlapping technology.

A roundtable organized by the United Nations International Telecommunications Union earlier in the week held informational sessions on the impact of patent litigation in the wireless industry. A number of major companies were represented, including Google, Microsoft, Intel, Philips, Hewlett-Packard, Sony, Qualcomm, Research In Motion along with Apple and Samsung.

Patent expert Florian Mueller of FOSS Patents witnessed the deep divide within the wireless industry during the round table’s first two sessions, but explained that the talks did show promise.

“Even if it’s impossible to find common ground, meetings like today’s ITU roundtable serve various useful purposes,” Mueller wrote. “But a roundtable is not a substitute for the court decisions that will have to come down in the months and years ahead, or for decisive regulatory action.”

What the talks accomplish, is the exposition of the underlying issues of intellectual property within the industry. With a full grasp of the problems, regulators can do their best to stop infringement moving forward.

“There were no winners or losers today because they all contributed to a timely, well-organized and informative event,” Mueller said. “In a way, today’s winner was the ITU.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top