Vanity Fair's Article On The Death of Michael Jackson Spurs Lawsuit

Janet Jackson’s lawyers has issued an ultimatum to Vanity Fair magazine for running a story that made false claims surrounding the death of Michael Jackson. The arcticle accused Janet of delaying Michael Jackson’s funeral over payment issues. According to the story Janet demanded repayment for $40,000 burial-plot deposit she gave to the cemetery.

Jackson is calling foul on the piece. Her attorney Blair G. Brown added it’s “untrue” and “outrageous.” According to Brown Janet paid for the funeral following the death of her brother and Michael’s estate reimbursed her for “some of those expenses” the following year.

“This story is particularly hurtful and distressing because of Ms. Jackson’s strong desire to serve her brother,  whom she loved dearly and her wish to stand with and support her family.”

Despite the threat of a lawsuit Vanity Fair appears to be standing firm, only making a minor correction to the amount Janet borrowed to the estate. In the a statement to E! News a rep for the magazine stated,

“Vanity Fair stands by Randall Sullivan’s assertion that Janet Jackson’s demand to be reimbursed for her deposit on her brother’s burial plot was one of the reasons Michael Jackson’s funeral was delayed. Sullivan’s sources told him that the amount of the deposit was $40,000, but records released last week indicate that the amount of the deposit was $49,000. Vanity Fair will make that correction on VF.com.”

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top