Surprise: Red States Gave More Money to Charity than Blue States

Who is more charitable—Republicans or Democrats?

Based on stereotypes of each side’s world views, many people would think that liberal Democrats were more likely to give money to charity. But a new study by the Chronicle of Philanthropy has concluded that residents of red states gave a higher share of their income to charity than blue state residents.

Using the 2008 election results, the Chronicle concluded that the eight states with residents who gave the most to charity supported John McCain in 2008, while the seven states with residents who gave the least to charity voted for President Obama.

The eight most generous states were Utah, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, South Carolina, Idaho, Arkansas and Georgia. Of those, Utah was the most generous, with residents giving away 10.6 percent of their income.The least generous states were Wisconsin, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, Maine and New Hampshire. Residents of New Hampshire were the stingiest, giving away just 2.5 percent.New York was the state with the highest rate of giving in the Northeast, coming in 17th place with 4.7 percent of income given away. In the West, Arizona was tops at 18th place with 4.6 percent.

“The reasons for the discrepancies among states, cities, neighborhoods are rooted in part in each area’s political philosophy about the role of government versus charity,” said the study’s authors, who also noted that “religion has a big influence on giving patterns.”

“Regions of the country that are deeply religious are more generous than those that are not,”the study says. “Two of the top nine states—Utah and Idaho—have high numbers of Mormon residents, who have a tradition of tithing at least 10 percent of their income to the church. The remaining states in the top nine are all in the Bible Belt.”

According to the Chronicle, “to account for sharp differences in the cost of living across America” the study “compared generosity rates after residents paid taxes, housing, food, and other necessities.”

Only households with incomes at or above $50,000 were included.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top