More than Thousand Georgia Businesses Not Complying with Immigration Law

More than a thousand Georgia businesses are not complying with a key provision of Georgia’s controversial anti-immigration law, according to a complaint filed by an illegal immigration activist. Businesses could be in danger of not having access to state funds if they don’t comply.

The Georgia law requires the government employers with two or more employees file annual reports certifying that they and their contractors are using E-Verify to check the immigration status of employees. Illegal immigration activist D.A. King initiated the complaint. Since the story was broken in June by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution the state Department of Audits and Accounts has sent letters to about 1,190 government agencies notifying them they were not in compliance with the law, which requires businesses to file reports by Dec. 31.
In its June warning letter, the state said businesses that didn’t file by June 25 risked losing access to state funding that included tens of millions in community development block grants. They could also receive fines of up to $5,000 from the state’s immigration enforcement panel.

The state law has also given local citizens the opportunity to become their own immigration enforcement officers. In Vidalia in Toombs County, a man named Michael Dale Smith of Twin City accused the city of giving illegal immigrants safe harbor by allowing them to live, travel and work within the city limits—an allegation the city denies. A three-member group was appointed to investigate and report its findings.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top