Janet Jackson Denies She Needs Michael’s Money to Care for Mother

A report claiming that the Estate of Michael Jackson filed documents in the probate court requesting that the estate be permitted to “foot a portion of the bill on Janet’s mortgage on her posh Las Vegas Condo” is false, according to her lawyer.

According to Blair Brown, Jackson’s attorney, Jackson’s Las Vegas home was purchased outright 10 years ago for her mother Katherine Jackson. Jackson has “provided financial support unconditionally to her mother before and after Michael’s death and will continue to do so,” said one of her representatives.

Brown offered that any implication that Jackson has demanded money from the estate are “false and outrageous.”

“She is a successful artist and very high net worth individual who has never had financial problems. She has no need for any such payments from the estate,” said Brown.

The Jackson family has recently been in the spotlight for its ongoing dispute over the legitimacy of Michael Jackson’s will – which currently leaves everything in the estate to his mother and his children.

Five of Michael’s siblings have recently claimed that the will was fake, demanding that the executors of the estate be dismissed.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top