Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Film
FilmNews

'Daredevil' Better Go Into Production Soon Or Fox Will Lose The Rights

Posted byBy Joe Cohen | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

The rights to Marvel’s Daredevil could be heading back to its home.

The clock is ticking on the project that Fox says is actively in development. They even announced Joe Carnahan as the new director, but that might not be enough.

Fox is currently in control of the rights to Daredevil, which first hit the screen in 2003 starring Ben Affleck. Since then, the studio failed to do anything else with the franchise. Under the deal between Fox and Marvel, the sequel has to be put into production by early October or risk forfeiting the rights.

Fox, who already received two deadline extensions from Marvel, is apparently making efforts to bring the project to screen, but suffered some unfortunate set backs when the studio lost director David Slade.

Now, the word is out that the license will expire this week. Carnahan took to twitter to announce the bad news. “Think my idea for a certain retro, red-suited, Serpico-styled superhero went up in smoke today kids.” He then added, “We shall see. Time is NOT on anyone’s side.”

Marvel has been spreading the love to all the major studios by licensing their characters out. Fox acquired X-Men, Fantastic Four and Daredevil. New Line got Iron Man and The Hulk, which was first in the hands of Universal.

More details on the Daredevil progress coming soon…

Source

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top