Apple-Samsung Trial Reveals $50 Billion in iPhone Revenue

As a result of the on-going Apple-Samsung trial, both companies have been forced to reveal detailed information on their sales figures. Through the court filings, the amazing success of Apple’s iPhone can be put into hard numbers. AllThingsD posted mobile sales of both companies on Thursday, detailing the number of units sold as well as the revenue earned by each model cited in the case.

The boom in Apple’s business since the release of the iPhone has been well-documented in their quarterly earning reports, but the direct impact of the smartphone on their revenue numbers is staggering. Since the release of the original iPhone in June 2007, the various models of the phone have sold some 85 million units, resulting in $50 billion in U.S. revenue. The biggest shift in the iPhone boom came in 2011, when Apple ended its exclusive relationship with AT&T, and brought the iPhone to other cellular carriers.

Apple and Samsung are currently in a dispute over patents, with Apple having filed suit claiming that Samsung’s more recent designs were “slavishly copying” the iPhone model. As a counter-measure, Samsung filed a counter suit claiming that Apple had violated patents involving the way mobile communications are handled in general. Samsung released information dating back to June 2010, having shipped two dozen different smartphone models in that time. While the company sold 21.3 million units total, Apple sold 60.1 million iPhone in the same time period.

As the smartphone market grows more competitive, more disputes have arisen over smartphone patents. Though Apple stands as the clear leader, it is uncertain whether or not the new iPhone 5 model will be able to maintain the same level of dominance for the company. Apple is seeking $2.5 billion in damages from Samsung, and a victory could mean a lot for the company’s aggressive legal campaign against its competition.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top