Validity of Michael Jackson’s Will to be Challenged in Court

The will of deceased pop legend Michael Jackson is once again being scrutinized, this time in federal court.

Howard Mann, who published a tribute book on Jackson, filed legal documents on Monday claiming that he was “in possession of evidence that casts substantial doubt on the validity of the will.” Mann told the New York Daily News this week that he hopes to present the evidence in court during the upcoming trial concerning copyright on his book.

Janet Jackson, along with siblings Randy and Rebbie, believe that the 2002 will is fake because it was signed in Los Angeles on a date when Jackson was allegedly in New York at an event with civil rights leader Al Sharpton. Moreover, Mann is considering calling experts regarding “variances” in the will’s handwriting, as well as the misspelling of the kids’ names.

“I am not backing down from my court fight with these guys. I’m not interested in settling with them. I came out and said these guys were a fraud two years ago,” Mann told The News.

“I have many people who will come out and give testimony that the entire administration is a fraud and a collusive operation that is designed to take assets away from Katherine and Michael’s kids.”

Two of Jacksons siblings had differing sentiments about the matter. Jermaine and Tito Jackson’s views were initially in tandem with the rest of the family but they later backed off. Jermaine recanted “all the claims made against” the Estate while Tito rescinded his signature to address the issue in a more private manner.

In their pursuit, the rest of the Jackson family remains insistent upon their claim of having no hidden motives.

“What will be gained by a finding of invalidity is that the executors will be replaced and the Estate and the guardianship will be managed in the best interests of the children, which is what Michael wanted,” said the Jackson family in a statement.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top