Connecticut Town Sued for Housing Discrimination

A small town in Connecticut is buried in controversy after a lawsuit was filed claiming the housing authority discriminated against black residents.

The Winchester Housing Authority is being accused of discrimination because of their policy which only hands out Section 8 vouchers to people living in the 17 towns that comprise their district since most of areas are over 90 percent white. The suit alleges the town wants to keep its minority population at statistically zero percent.

The suit was filed by Crystal Carter and the Connecticut Fair Housing Center. Carter was denied an application because she didn’t live in the district and was forced to live in a shelter while she tried to secure housing for herself and her six children. Carter was also a victim of domestic violence. “Although WHA’s waiting list was open to applicants, WHA refused even to send Ms. Carter an application, telling her that she was ineligible because she did not live within the Rental Assistance Alliance,” said the lawsuit. “WHA also told Carter that Winchester was not on a ‘bus line,’ there were no real jobs there, and it was in the ‘woods.’ WHA recommended that Ms. Carter apply to the housing programs in Bridgeport, New Haven, or Torrington, all communities with considerably larger African-American and Hispanic populations than the towns in the Rental Assistance Alliance.”

The lawsuit has caused WHA to examine their policies and they were working to change them according to News One.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top