Will.I.Am., Black Eyed Peas Sue Former Manager for $3 Million

Three of the Black Eyed Peas have filed a lawsuit against their former business manager for $3 million in losses. According to the Los Angeles Times, Sean M. Larkin cost the trio millions when he neglected to file tax returns for the group from 2002 to 2009. According to a lawyer representing Taboo, apl.de.ap and Will.I.Am, “Larkin falsely represented … on numerous occasions that he was taking care of everything and that they had nothing to worry about.”

Larkin acknowledges his mismanagement of the band and some of his other clients saying he “got in over my head with the amount of clients I had.” Fergie, the fourth band mate, is not involved in the suit since she has her own business manager. According to the suit, the band discovered the delinquent tax bills in 2009 and confronted Larkin, who said he would fix the issue. The band eventually fired him and paid off their bills but they still need some records from Larkin in order to finish returns for their touring company. Larkin himself filed for bankruptcy back in April and the Peas’ complaint is a part of Larkin’s Chapter 7 filing. He is also allegedly being sued by two other clients and owes the government $1 million. Larkin did not return any calls from the L.A. Times for additional commentary.

In other Peas related news, their song “My Humps” has been cited as the song with the worse song lyrics ever, according to a poll by Global Gathering. They beat out artists like Nicki Minaj and Taio Cruz with 22 percent of the vote because of repetitive and simplistic lyrics like “My hump, my hump, my hump, my hump, my hump, My hump, my hump, my hump, my lovely little lumps.” But the Peas probably weren’t shooting for lyrical genius praise when they came up with that one.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top