Blackout Ends As DirecTV Backs Down Viacom In Carriage Dispute

Viacom and DirecTV have finally reached an agreement ending a nine-day blackout that removed channels like Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, MTV and other Viacom channels from the homes of DirecTV’s customers.

The carriage dispute between the two companies revolved around disagreements in licensing fees, according to a source close to negotiations, DirecTV reps said the media giant demanded a 30% increase in fees, but Viacom maintained it was only asking for a fair deal.

After negotiations fell apart, Viacom pulled their 26 channels from the satellite TV company, a move that reportedly affected over 20 million American homes.

However, viewers were not the only ones affected. Both companies suffered blows in the dispute, with Viacom seeing sharp ratings declines while DirecTV experienced subscription cancellations. Therefore, both sides were anxious to get the deal done, negotiating all day Thursday through to the early Friday morning hours, according to the source familiar with the situation.

Still, it was Viacom had to back off their initial fee demands. Financial terms were undisclosed, but DirecTV was able to get Viacom to back off the 30% increase in fees and settle for something much lower. The deal has a term of seven years.

In  a statement Viacom expressed they were happy with the terms of the agreement saying, “Viacom is extremely pleased to bring its programming back to DirecTV subscribers, and thanks everyone affected by the disruption for their patience and understanding during this challenging period.”

On the other hand, DirectTV claimed an outright victory:

“The attention surrounding this unnecessary and ill-advised blackout by Viacom has accomplished one key thing: it serves notice to all media companies that bullying TV providers and their customers with blackouts won’t get them a better deal,” said Derek Chang, executive vice president of content strategy and development for DirecTV. “It’s high time programmers ended these anti-consumer blackouts once and for all and prove our industry is about enabling people to connect to their favorite programs rather than denying them access.”

Let us know who you think won this battle in the comment section below:

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top