Carl Lewis Unsure On Usain Bolt’s Olympic Gold Chances

It is one thing for the casual track fan to doubt Jamaican’s Usain Bolt’s chances of repeating gold in the 100 meter reace. But when it comes from a nine-time gold medalist, well, it carries just a little more weight.

So, when Carl Lewis, one of the greatest Olympic track heroes of all time speaks, it’s heavy. But his reasoning had little to do with Bolt’s skills as it did the dynamics of being on top.

“The reason it hasn’t been done is because it’s hard to stay at that level for a long period of time,” Lewis said to the Indo Asian News Service. “People are always trying to beat you when you are a champion.”

That has already played out in recent weeks. Yohan Blake, a friend and countryman, defeated Bolt in the Jamaican Olympic Trials  in both the 100 and 200, which are considered Bolt’s strongest events. So, Lewis wonders what impact being beaten has on him.

“Blake has beaten Bolt two years in a row now after the World Championships in 2011 and we don’t know what Bolt’s head is like when he loses,” Lewis said.

Lewis is the only man in Olympic history to repeat as gold medalist in the 100. But even that achievement is somewhat skewed. Lewis won the 100 as part of his epic four-gold performance in 1984 in Los Angeles when he was one of the overall stars of the Games. In 1988 in Seoul, Korea, Lewis came in second behind Canada’s Ben Johnson, who blistered the field.

However, Johnson tested positive for an anabolic steroid and had his first-place finish revoked. As the second-place finisher, Lewis was granted the gold retroactively, giving him, technically, back-to-back golds in the 100. As for the 200 meter race, no man has ever repeated as Olympic champion.

Blake and Justin Gatlin as legitimate challengers to Bolt, Lewis does not envision him standing at the gold medal stand when it is all over.

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top