Sarah Palin: Condoleezza Rice Would Be ‘Wonderful’ VP

Former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin jumped on the “Condoleezza Rice for Vice President” bandwagon yesterday by saying she would be a “wonderful vice president.”

This comes a day after Matt Drudge wrote an item on the Drudge Report claiming that the former Secretary of State was considered a leading contender to be Mitt Romney’s running mate—a claim that has more validity than most of the wild speculation in Washington because Drudge is a close friend of Romney campaign manager Matt Rhoades.

“She has much more experience than our sitting President does today,” Palin said of Rice—though it’s hard to see how anyone who has never been president could have more experience making presidential decisions than Obama, who has been doing it for four years.

Some have speculated that because Rice has said she is pro-choice, that would be a deal breaker for the Romney folks, who have said they needed an anti-abortion running mate (although Romney himself said he was pro-choice as recently as 2002). But Palin said that Rice’s pro-choice status shouldn’t be a big deal.

“We need to remember, though, that it’s not the vice president that would legislate abortion, and that would be Congress’s role. And we’ll keep that in mind,” Palin said.

Despite all the speculation, perhaps the biggest factor working against Rice as running mate is the fact that Rice has stated on more than one occasion that she has no interest in the job and that she doesn’t even like politics. Rice has never run for elected office, so though she has seen the rigors of campaigning from afar, she has never had to actually traverse the country on a daily basis, giving the same speeches over and over to crowds of strangers. That’s a lot to ask of a woman who says she doesn’t even have an interest in being vice president. The Romney folks may stick with the politicians who have been actively campaigning for the job—such as Florida Senator Marco Rubio or Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal.

 

 

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top