Comic-Con: Shaquille O’Neal, ‘The Black Panel’ Take On Lack of Diversity Among Comic Book Artists

“Culture eats strategy for lunch.”

That was probably the most intriguing thought to surface on Friday morning during a session that was bluntly titled “The Black Panel” at Comic-Con International.

Oddly enough, the maxim was attributed to Laura Ziskin, the now-deceased film producer who made a hit of the “Spider-Man” series. Ms. Ziskin’s words — in actuality a well-known business aphorism — were recalled by a panel member who said she used them to describe the behavior of people locked into a closed business culture like that of Hollywood. Her meaning: They tend to get involved with like-minded people with whom they are having lunch, no matter what their conscious strategy may be.

During Friday’s discussion, the Ziskin maxim became a way of explaining why black artists don’t get more traction in the comics and fantasy world. Still, there were no shortage of black creators and entrepreneurs in the room on Friday, including Shaquille O’Neal, who is now a media baron, with his own Shaq Entertainment.

If Ms. Ziskin delivered a message in absentia, AT&T, a sponsor of the panel, inadvertently delivered another: Twitter is no friend to gatherings like this.

Courtesy of an AT&T promotion, the discussion was conducted alongside a giant screen on which tweets popped up as the panelists held forth. It was like having informational mosquitoes buzz past your head at a media picnic. And there was no repellent.

Source: NY Times

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top